Kind of odd to be recording thoughts and impressions of the Zero scene. It feels a little illegitimate; as if it is somehow not what's appropriate for Zero consciousness, that Zen-like concept of effortless trance meditation, anchored in the immediate, floating and drifting with the musicians who are spinning their spells on stage in front of you. I used to take notes on most of my concert experiences, mostly for fun, sometimes for a writer's exercise - a focused journal entry - and occasionally for absent friends who wanted to know ... but that was always difficult for Zero. They were tough. After a particularly sublime moment, at a Maritime Hall show this past spring, all I could write was "nothing will be mine, here ... nothing, as in Zero." Not a scene to be recorded, only felt; experienced. It reminds me of a line from one of Ken Kesey's journals: "Only nothing is instantaneous./ Everything else takes time." Amen, Ken. This will take some time. Let me tell you about this band ... because the feeling they project now is that this part of their history won't last much longer; and like all histories, it carries the promise that the record of a time will mean more than just itself.
June 15, 1996 Zero show tonight. Not psyched, but a promise made ... And what a show. Only a few notes scribbled ... Best I've ever seen them perform. A perfect catharsis, musically: some great bluesy, heavy rock, interspliced with long instrumental jazz numbers; simply elegant, sublime musicianship throughout. Zero is cantankerous; they have a definite edgy personality. When they're on, they'll amaze; and when the mood isn't right, they can sink to the moment. But tonight, from the moment they opened - with some gorgeous instrumental - they could hit no sour note. I was transported. Even though incredibly tired, almost passing out on my feet by the end, but enjoying every note. Highlights were the opener; "She's So Heavy," with a great job on vocals and the kind of building crescendos that acknowledged the Dead's influence nicely; and the final two tunes of the second set, long instrumentals that carried you through every stage of emotional response. Splendid catharsis, indeed.
That was the show that I 'got it' - had my first Zero epiphany. And even then, I was still thinking of them as temperamental - though consummate - musicians. From the outset, a characteristic of Zero was that it had the rep as a musicians' band: they had the imprimatur of Marin County's finest for years before their audience surged following the post-Dead phenomenon of Deadheads pouring their efforts into surrogates. But Zero also inherited the anti-celebrity attitude of many musicians' bands: no star trips, something that saxophonist Martín Fierro had reputedly brushed up against when he was involved with the Dead for a few projects, including horn arrangements for an album as well as playing with Jerry Garcia in a couple of his side-bands. It left a mark on Zero that can still be seen in the resolute and natural way that they move through their audiences, who respectfully give them room, occasionally approach and are invariably dealt with politely; and why the band makes it a point to bring their infant children to shows. All part of the 'Zero Family' ethos that they successfully project.
Martín exemplifies that, to some extent: the guy who refuses to take himself too seriously, yet when he plays, it's nothing but serious ... but what a goof, off the sax.
Pardon me for barging into the notes on your private musings, Griffin, but I feel like something needs to be said here. Martín's incessant vocal riffings reminds me regularly of his saxophone solos. I'd go so far as to say that his voice box is just another one of the instruments he "goes outside" on. Listen to when he scats, such as on Tell Me All About It.
--GATEFOLD SLEEVE
Griffin replies:
I meant M is a goof off the sax, as in,
the Sayings of Chairman Martín, NOT his singing!
I think that's serious, too! (Of course!)
Even Steve can show some of that self-deprecating humor, musically. This spring I saw him with his own band, Steve Kimock and Friends, and he took a stunning solo with the guitar held up behind his neck, Hendrix-style - great spectacle to have with your musical vitamins. And the solo was first-rate, too; at first, I thought everybody was just cheering for the licks I was hearing, as I swayed with my eyes closed.
Martín was the reason I first went to see Zero, though. I had first encountered him on the Dead's studio masterpiece, Wake of the Flood, yet another of the many introductions they provided to so many other musics and musicians. It made me interested in hearing my first Zero gig, in the spring of 1988 at a San Francisco club. Even then, I thought they picked up on much of the feeling I had come to expect from the Dead - though Zero was very much its own beast. They laid claim to that elusive common territory that improvisation of all stripes seems to aim for at its heart, some sort of ur-communication - communion really - that describes a continuum encompassing performer and audience, from intention to composition to anticipation to reaction, that is seamless and whole and transcendent; and that is where Zero shines.
July 6, 1996 Zero was good last night. Very good. Several of those moments when the music was just perfect; in the presence of the X-factor. Such a cool, small place, too: the Fairfax Pavilion, which is nothing more than an old-fashioned high school gymnasium. And Zero was so down-home, so approachable in that context. First set was strong - the band played as if they were seriously enjoying themselves; not playful, but very, very interested in getting somewhere. And they did. ... By the second tune the place was sweltering - San Franciscans forget it's summer elsewhere in the Bay Area. And it was about ninety degrees and very humid, soon, in that place. ... Seeing the band from the side - a vantage the looseness of the crowd and the position of the beer pavilion permitted - was something of a treat, too; such a small, small place, and the musicians so accessible, seeing Steve muttering and mouthing the notes he was thinking, picking, pulling out of the moment, weaving his melody lines around Martín's sax or Chip's Hammond. Impossible not to dance, even when guarding a beer from other dancers, and everyone in the pavilion is boogying to Zero, too. Hot and sweaty in a high school gym again - it's been a while.
The reggae tune was well done, too - all I jotted was 'wow.' Zero is a band that can make much complexity and beauty from the simplest of platforms; a trait they share with certain other nameless Marin County bands, and a hallmark - the hallmark? - of great improvisation. This was so simple a launch vehicle ... and such a wondrous result. I had a couple of great conversations with fellow Deadheads at the break, discussing Zero, Quicksilver, some other Haight-Ashbury bands, and all matters hippie for a leisurely couple of bowls and the remainder of my beer. As I debate whether to have another, I saw a chance to speak to Martín and did - and after thanking him, somehow found myself asking him for his autograph. And he was so friendly and personable and seemed delighted, drawing a little picture for me on one of my notecards and signing it, in a big bold scrawl; it kind of made me think of some of his solos - and he hugged me as he handed it to me; I was flabbergasted. Not exactly the stereotype of the unapproachable artist.
Second set is where this show truly shone. The Chance In a Million jam was nirvana; I wrote: "All the music I need." They covered all of my sacred musical bases, all of the emotional landscape necessary to make catharsis flow. Then came Little Wing. Get this tape. Jimi smiles when he sees tribute like this. The crowd went nuts; a sea of surging, pulsing, leaping tie-dye. The spirit lives on, I think. My last comment was next to Pits of Thunder - "wow, Zero stripped to a four-piece," which smoked. As Ralph Gleason used to say to close his concert reviews for the Chronicle back in the Sixties, even one like the Fillmore Acid Test, 'Quite a night.' Indeed.
So why write it now? Because they have this new album out ... and it's very, very good ... and it feels strange, as if this might be a scene, an artistic community that is about to break open, reach a whole new level of exposure and popularity and fame, and lose some of itself in the process, almost a flashback to the sense of dread I had when I listened to the Dead's In the Dark, and thought that the secret was finally out. Old Deadheads called the new converts In-the-Darkheads, and the scene never really got its feet back underneath itself after that;
I always heard them called Touch-heads, after that album's hit single, Touch of Grey. Never used that term (either term) myself, since at best I could be considered a Shakedown-head and more honestly an Alabama-head, but even that belies the interim period in which I discovered this music, and the truth is I've always been more of a tapehead.
--GATEFOLD SLEEVE
there just wasn't enough time and oldtimers to teach the new seekers how to behave, how to fit in, how to learn and grow and make their own contribution to the scene. Ironically, in that sense Deadheadom was sunk by the same ethos that sunk the Haight, which Garcia talked about in his long Rolling Stone interview with Greening of America author Charles Reich: "For any scene to work, along with that freedom there's implicit responsibility - you have to be doing something somewhere along the line - there is no free ride. And you have to know where you're going. It's helpful to have a scene that will indulge you long enough to let you find out." Too many people and it simply sinks.
April 18, 1997 The Zero crowd strikes me as being awfully similar to the most sophisticated part of the Dead audience, drawn by something like the inverse of the Dead's central form of improvisation: the limits of suggested - implied - improvisation, the way classical music embraces the limits of interpretation. Catalina comes off beautifully, and the end makes me realize - this is the nascent Dead; I am watching a scene in the throes of evolution. Yes I know it's already a decade - more than a decade - old, but the vibe has that feel ... that if they push things a bit, this could play in Peoria.
Which may be part of why the Zero scene doesn't have that same level of absolute openness that the Dead scene did. There is an initiation. As you walk in, the first sense you get before a Zero concert is more like the feel of a jazz club, with bright musically literate patrons who reflect the passion and competitiveness of the musicians in front of them. And if you listen well, respectfully, attentively, and make the right noises, and get it - without giving a goddamn for anything else around you - then you pass, and next time you'll get a nod. Zero's fans are a bit more ebullient and effusive than that, but they're every bit as reflective and literate. And enough of them were Deadheads to know that they don't want their scene to outgrow itself, and get diluted into that old traditional audience-performer dichotomy epitomized by a pool of drunk faces yelling at a stage of besieged musicians to play their radio hits.
The scene opens up when you show your interest; when you dance to the music, and not to show off or cruise for romance, though that can happen when you don't make it a goal. It seems like shows have more and more dancing over the last couple of years, though whenever I crossed the bridge into Marin, it was always wall-to-wall movement, swaying and grooving. It takes a little longer for San Franciscans, I guess; or maybe the City is where they are picking up their new, younger fans, most of whom have never been trained to listen and dance and forget and flow. Zero is teaching them. They are nothing if not great mentors. Demanding teachers, too. The funniest moment my fifteen years of concerts came at a Steve Kimock and Friends show, long past midnight, at a tiny bar in San Rafael, bandstand so low a beer glass on the floor stuck up an inch or so above, and a devotee was getting tired, no longer able to do much more than twitch, and as Steve is taking another solo, subtle and eloquent, the fan yawns, right in front of Martín, only a couple of feet away, holding his horn, attentively waiting for his friend to finish playing, catches sight of this stifled power yawn - and just thwacks the fan, as if to say "hey, wake up! pay attention!" and I just collapsed with laughter. The performer-audience barrier according to Martín.
... They came on at a little past 9:30, starting off with a slow groove, nice and mellow; a good blues, good vehicle for the mood, and the jam, to evolve. Steve's first solo showed lots of energy. Then some oomph, a groove tune next and Martín just soars over the melody, punching through the groove like a paper bag; he shines. When Steve jumps in and on and around him, it feels like you're listening to a bull-fighter dancing with a bull, leading him around the ring gently, respectfully, and Martín is allowing himself to be led. Rigor Mortis was superb. 'Wow' was all I could manage to write. So much space in the groove; part of what Zero does so well: simple arrangements played simply, opening them up and out and exploring every crack and crevice.
Over the years that I was seeing other bands, I kept checking in with Zero. I still didn't fully 'get it' - there were always those around me who clearly were getting more of what was going on than me. But there was always enough to draw me back. After this many years of seeing bands for whom the live performance was the principle means of artistic expression, I knew it might take a few times. At first, I found their rhythm too clinical, their sound too bright and thin; now I wonder whether I simply was clueless, or if their sound reinforcement has improved, or if I have simply learned and grown. When I heard their new album, I thought back to that impression because Judge's vocals seemed too bright, as if the bass had been lopped off; there may be some truth to that - in concert, I think his baritone has much greater depth than on the disc. But speakers wash everything together, and maybe they mixed for that. It's still a good sounding CD. It should win a great many converts, if it gets decent distribution and any kind of airplay at all.
That first gig made me feel that they had absorbed much of the Dead's feel for improvising, since their jams definitely captured the ethos that the Dead did, but I didn't know at the time to what extent that terrain had been explored by so many others, including several other Haight-Ashbury bands in the Sixties, including one that featured a guitarist who would go on to play with Zero, John Cipollina, whose work with Quicksilver Messenger Service in the Sixties was a major contribution to rock guitar's electric vocabulary. The more I learned, the more I realized that Zero was drawing from the same well of predominantly American musical forms that the Dead and Quicksilver and Janis's first band, Big Brother and the Holding Company, and the Airplane and Country Joe and the Fish and several others all explored, each emphasizing certain currents over others, mixing them all together and exploring collectively, elevating the jam into the grand artistic grail for the evening.
In fact, I'm pretty sure it was Cipollina's name that brought me out to my first Zero show, at the Great American Music Hall in 1987. And of course I wondered who's that other guitarist who seems to be playing the leads.
--GATEFOLD SLEEVE
Most of those bands said then - and some of their surviving members continue to say today - admiring things about the others; they all seem to feel that on a given night, one of their peers was the best band performing at the time. Zero falls so squarely in that long, loose lineage, heirs to the same rich and diverse set of traditions, all the way down to their generosity in crediting those early San Francisco rock giants. In their new album, they thank Jerry Garcia in the credits, and despite their large spiritedness, I wonder if there was a pause over that one; the critically mindless dismissive comparisons to the Dead must rankle a bit by now.
First set began - and at the very first solo, I wrote "SK owns the guitar-tripping audience." The 'lineal successor to Jerry' appellation is contained right there: more than anything else, that is the reason. Those beautifully articulated, liquid, pure-picked notes - why a certain core of people find it intoxicating to listen to him. My favorite comment from a clueless scenester behind me was "they sound like a jazz band!" and the sneer stretching out 'jazz' was simply poetic in its irony. That was where I stopped taking notes for the first set, concentrating instead on dancing and floating. Great great set: they smoked and sang and wailed in fine and high style.
In a recent America On-Line interview, one fan wrote to ask if it was true that Steve had studied with Garcia, prompting the response: "NO, I NEVER STUDIED WITH ANYBODY." A nice use of caps to show his pique; and for those who have listened to both guitarists, while it is clear they both admire certain qualities in playing and perhaps even draw on a similar pool of influences, it's also clear that they approach their craft from somewhat different trajectories. And for Steve, who has so many different tones and sounds and styles to choose for whatever mimesis he's after, it has to be irritating to have people only discuss one of your many influences.
But he claims that he was not even influenced by that other guitarist. Is that really possible?
--GATEFOLD SLEEVE
That said, it also has to be noted that he is the only guitarist who can actually pay homage to Garcia without sounding like a rip-off, or a second-rate apprentice. Of course, he can also do that with Hendrix, Clapton, Gilmore, Les Paul, and a few others, but the Garcia acknowledgement is consummate; something I found out at a Missing Man Formation show at the Fillmore.
... and the band began a long, interesting jam that culminated in - Saint Stephen. My God. At the Fillmore. I was in heaven. And Kimock amply demonstrated his status as the reigning King of San Francisco Psychedelic Guitar. He ruled, playing with an intensity and reverence and concentration that was THE mesmerizing, virtuoso performance of the evening. It had everything that the other guitarists on that stage lacked: fire, speed, filigree and, most of all, so utterly in sync with everything - mood, melody, other players; and paying homage to the history of the song, and to its composer. Simply amazing; and such a nice, long version. At one point the power was so intense, the outpouring around so enveloping it was as if I were tripping .... Second set began with a long jammed-out instrumental, segueing perhaps into another tune, or simply more of the same with other bits enveloped and blended in; I jotted down that Kimock has a way of working in so many allusions and references to other great musicians that he has you always reassured that you're in the safe and knowledgeable hands of a fine teacher - "let me be the person to tell you what you already know." The set closer was Stella Blue, instrumental only, with Kimock on pedal steel. Haunting, lovely, elegiac, it was a moving and eloquent tribute to the Missing Man.
Steve is not an imitator; nor has Zero ever been a cover band, which is why the halls they play don't become crucibles, melt-point tests for audience and band, seeing how close they can come to the real thing. Zero spaces are more like alembics, the medieval reaction vessels used by alchemists to try to make lead into gold - and moreover, to add mass in the process, pulling matter from thin air; something from nothing, appropriate for a band called Zero.
... Dancing out here takes on strange and fun and carnal shades, air of an attached man perhaps, or just a well-trained Deadhead dancer, and it seems as if my night is dominated by the alternating and occasionally competing dance maneuvers with some periods of somewhat inappropriate brushings and touches in the course of some of the more fevered parts ... but only because the music had some fevered moments. Like a Zero'ed account of Robert Johnson, inescapable - ruthless? - pounding, almost discordant with inarticulate, intense emotion. A Chip-led vocal powerhouse.
Would that have been Crossroads?
--GATEFOLD SLEEVE
The weirdness of the first set still rings loud over the crowd buzz. Sitting carefully, beer protected between my crossed legs, only safe place in the floor-wide free-traffic zone, a sea of swishing, beer-fueled and bladder-driven legs seeking restroomage ... a floor now undanceable in its common denominator ... and an odd sort of edginess to the crowd, mostly older; a faint hostility by the older hippies, defiantly stoned, not sharing but in your face, all offended by my smiling, short-haired countenance, mistaken for a slumming yuppie, plundering experience ... a reminder that for many, Zero is a tight scene at war with itself, and their band, in some ways, which needs greater success in order to keep Missing Man from permanently stealing Bobby and Steve. A few minutes before the second set, large holes and sparseness open up in front of the stage, the crowd saying okay, dazzle us, and I edge closer, even establishing a space for my friends, though one of them seems to have found emptier pastures to twirl in. Xian returns ... the second set is a dream ... Little Wing Chance In A Million Spoken For Friday's Child ... all the way into the wee hours, till almost 2:30 in the morning, a gross and clear violation of local and Hall rules and God, I can see Zero catching it for this, but what the Hell, we loved it.
With the new album, fears of Missing Man scooping Zero's innards out seems banished. And the audience feels like it's gelling, though it doesn't have quite the feel of being firmly fixed yet. I've been to most of the Zero and Zero-family-related shows in the last three years, and the crowd is solidifying, but still growing and fluctuating, it feels. One hallmark of that is the degree to which it feels like a captive audience - fans - versus scenesters, people on the venue's guest list, the merely curious, or the random. Last year at a Fillmore show I wrote "Not exactly the feel of a Dead scene gathering. But a pleasant atmosphere, and we talk among our neighbors a little; not too much. The sense of shared community seems notably absent - much more a sense of, 'well, I was this kind of Deadhead, not like you.' The classic American suspicion of others, and assumption of difference until proved otherwise. So different from the feel of the Dead scene, especially before In the Dark - that wonderful sense of family and familiarity, of openness and caring." But Zero shows are getting that way, more and more, as committed fans come to achieve a few hours of Zero consciousness, and the scenesters get slowly absorbed, or displaced.
December 31, 1996 What a night ... a band still surprising me, completely. Their sound - is like atomized time, whole universes in each split-second: the essence of why Zero makes for great psychedelic music ... the endless implications and potential to pursue any and every direction, at any pregnant point, hangs heavy and redolent in those solos, those melodies, those floating, crystalline rhythms ....
August 15, 1997 And second set ... A perfect one ... how did that go? Well ... very, very well. And with dire thoughts of what success could do to them and us and what it would feel like to hear them in so much bigger venues ... but yeah, they could fill a stadium ... their sound is so full, so round; their command of dynamics is so complete.
Looking forward to the Fillmore September show. First one in a while for me. Only another week before the official release of the disc, and the ride begins in earnest.