Pink Floyd

We are puzzled by the fact that advertisements for the new Pink Floyd double-live album, Pulse, declare enthusiastically that it "contains a complete performance of Dark Side of the Moon." We are willing to concede that one might wish to own Dark Side of the Moon. But why on earth would one wish to pay money for a recording of a live performance of an album noted mostly for its studio sound? Especially when the original record is hardly rare and would be much cheaper (and what Floyd fan wouldn't own the damn thing already?). Ah, the mysteries of capitalismä

Yes

Back to Summer of the Living Dead